
Harper is brought to Louisiana bayou country to help out an old girlfriend who is worried that her husband will find out that she is cheating on him. What is more, he finds himself caught in a power struggle between the matriarch of the family and a greedy oil baron, who wants her property. Poor Harper! Things are not as straight-forward as they initially appeared.... (Full plot summary below)
Enjoy FREE movies and series with your Prime (USA) subscription or when you start a 30-day free trial!
Links compiled using automated software. Availability of offers subject to change / might be region specific / out of date.
Harper is brought to Louisiana bayou country to help out an old girlfriend who is worried that her husband will find out that she is cheating on him. What is more, he finds himself caught in a power struggle between the matriarch of the family and a greedy oil baron, who wants her property. Poor Harper! Things are not as straight-forward as they initially appeared.
Leave your thoughts about The Drowning Pool.
| Ozus' World Movie ReviewsDennis SchwartzIt has a field day recycling private eye cliches while down in the bayou. |
| VarietyVariety StaffStylish, improbable, entertaining, superficial, well cast, and totally synthetic. |
| Parallax ViewRichard T. JamesonPerhaps the saddest thing about The Drowning Pool is that the incompetence-cum-artiness of Stuart Rosenberg has subverted the talent of the usually redoubtable Gordon Willis. |
| Spirituality and PracticeFrederic and Mary Ann BrussatAbout a cool gumshoe with a one-track mind solving the case he's on |
| Chicago ReaderDon DrukerYou can tell from the credit sequence—when Paul Newman takes four minutes to execute a simple expository gag—that this Stuart Rosenberg sequel to Harper is likely to be an interminable drag. And the opener is really the high point of an alleged thriller that wastes the talents of Newman, Joanne Woodward, Murray Hamilton, and Tony Franciosa, and telegraphs all its narrative twists with the subtlety of a Chicago building inspector explaining how to avoid a violation. |
| Chicago Sun-TimesRoger EbertA confusing and not very exciting private eye caper. |
| New York TimesA.H. WeilerThis second time around for Harper is a lackluster workout despite its colorful settings, occasional tension and a cast that includes Joanne Woodward (Mrs. Newman). As a convoluted caper it generates action rather than character and surface mystery rather than meaning. |
| User ReviewClay BAn excellent sequel to Harper. It takes everything great from the first film without being repetitive. Paul Newman delivered a great performance as did a young Melanie Griffith. The story was extremely intriguing and entertaining, while also having a light hearted, comedic tone. Stuart Rosenberg made a film that isn't just fluff, it's extremely well made. If you enjoyed the first, I can't see you not liking this. |
| User ReviewRoy NPaul Newman reprises his role from "Harper" (1966) in this laid-back neo-noir set in the deep south. Director Stuart Rosenberg really hits the nail on the head with this intelligent and carefully paced movie. |
| User ReviewStephen CHarper returns. As good as the first one. It has one of the most mad escape attempts ever in it, that's not really suited for the film. Still, all is good with this one. |