
Paris, 1786: a woman in court. The Crown murdered her father for his views about the poor, now Jeanne wants her home and good name back. She believes all can be set right if she can talk to the Queen, whose House Minister rebuffs her. With the help of a courtside gigolo, she learns to use what others desire to get what she wants. She needs a patron: with forged letters, she convinces Cardinal de Rohan she is the Queen's confidante and can help him regain royal favor. Jeanne c... (Full plot summary below)
Enjoy FREE movies and series with your Prime (USA) subscription or when you start a 30-day free trial!
Links compiled using automated software. Availability of offers subject to change / might be region specific / out of date.
Paris, 1786: a woman in court. The Crown murdered her father for his views about the poor, now Jeanne wants her home and good name back. She believes all can be set right if she can talk to the Queen, whose House Minister rebuffs her. With the help of a courtside gigolo, she learns to use what others desire to get what she wants. She needs a patron: with forged letters, she convinces Cardinal de Rohan she is the Queen's confidante and can help him regain royal favor. Jeanne conspires to have the Cardinal purchase a fabulous diamond necklace for the Queen. He delivers it to Jeanne for Marie Antoinette. If the scheme breaks down, what then? Might this affair spark revolution?
Leave your thoughts about The Affair of the Necklace.
| St. Paul Pioneer PressChris HewittThe psychology is muddled, the badinage is bad and the acting is inadequate. |
| St. Paul Pioneer PressChris Hewitt (St. Paul)The psychology is muddled, the badinage is bad and the acting is inadequate. |
| Charlotte ObserverLawrence ToppmanThe kind of movie made bearable only by uttering snide comments to a friend. |
| EmanuelLevy.ComEmanuel LevyMuch of the dramatic juice and intrigue have been drained out of this old-fashioned costume drama, that in the hands of director Charles Shyer and actress Hilary Swank becomes stiff, stuffy, and banal affair. |
| New Times (L.A.)Gregory WeinkaufIt's beautiful and obvious, a dubious combination that may nonetheless ensure its success. |
| Los Angeles TimesKevin ThomasShyer and Sweet bring consistent clarity and ever-increasing depth to the playing out of Jeanne's bold scheming and single-minded resolve; a tone of brisk wit gives way effortlessly to poignancy and ultimately tragedy. |
| TimeRichard SchickelThe affair may have raised eyebrows all over 18th century Paris, but it's not likely to elicit more than a shrug from 21st century moviegoers. |
| Film Journal InternationalHarry HaunBoth Swank and Shyer sink without a trace into the fog of the story trying to be told. |
| Seattle Post-IntelligencerWilliam ArnoldThe affair of the necklace itself is so complex and many-sided that it would take a Sidney Lumet to do justice to it on film. |
| Greenwich Village GazetteEric LurioThe performances are really good, and if you're into clothes, this is fascinating, but the film itself is pretty much a bore. |