Follows Sam's adventures at a top-secret training program for a new class of second-born royals tasked with saving the world.... (Full plot summary below)
Enjoy FREE movies and series with your Prime (USA) subscription or when you start a 30-day free trial!
Follows Sam's adventures at a top-secret training program for a new class of second-born royals tasked with saving the world.
Leave your thoughts about Secret Society of Second-Born Royals.
| CNNBrian LowryAn extremely clever concept that takes the "spares" in the royal equation and turns them into a superhero group. While hardly a blockbuster, this Disney+ movie occupies the upper tier of the kind of movies that have proved quite popular for Disney Channel. |
| Screen RantMolly FreemanSecret Society of Second-Born Royals is pure family-friendly fun, combining princesses and superheroes for a delightful, if unoriginal, adventure. |
| PolygonPetrana RadulovicThe movie is full of the best bits of the kid-adventure genre — exciting and weird powers! Cool training montages! Intriguing plot! — but when it brings in heavier emotional stakes, the elements don’t quite gel. |
| RogerEbert.comBrian TallericoNothing about this inert, dull project feels like a movie. It’s a half-idea, half-heartedly filmed. Yes, it’s a kids’ movie, but kids are smarter in 2020 about their action entertainment and putting this alongside all the Marvel movies on Disney Plus feels almost mean. |
| The New York TimesJeannette CatsoulisThe most polished superpower on display in the defiantly unexciting Secret Society of Second-Born Royals is the ability to say its title without spitting. |
| New York PostJohnny OleksinskiThanks to Marvel, many films are trying to cash in on cape-and-spandex mania right now, but unlike the MCU, they look like crapola. If you’re going to make a superhero movie today, you gotta have a budget. “Secret Society,” perhaps, had Microsoft Paint. |
| IndieWireDavid EhrlichIt’s hard to tell if it’s deliberately targeting a certain demographic or just too sloppy and unsophisticated to work on anyone who’s learned to tell the difference in quality between “Cars” and “Planes.” |
| User ReviewTechnoGoblinIt's a bad movie. The acting isn't good, the writing doesn't help and the budget wasn't very good either, but it is possible to enjoy (if you drastically lower your standards). If you want something nice to watch with your 7-12 year old kids, give it a watch to pass the time. |
| User ReviewJLuis_001Disney tries to make people believe that some of the original content they bring to Disney + has a better quality than what they produced for the Disney Channel, but the truth is that even if they change the presentation, the stench is unmistakable. |
| User ReviewElthorIt has become obvious that Disney+ is largely a dumping ground for any inferior content generated either accidentally by Disney or intentionally (like in the heyday of their direct-to-video sequels). Expecting SSoSBR to be good based on the trailer (which is more enjoyable than the movie) is foolish. Predictable, dull, thin garbage. Seriously, do not be fooled, this was a waste of time. |
