
Rob Greene has information about an undercover terror team inside the CIA led by Joe Connelly. To stay alive with the knowledge, he is advised to stay undercover by his supervisor Andrews. Connelly's men try to kill Greene, but he can escape and warns his son Danny that he also may be in danger and that he should look for Dog Thompson, an old military friend of Greene's. Together with Thompson and Bone Conn, another ex-soldier, Danny tries to escape Connelly's henchmen. Meanw... (Full plot summary below)
Enjoy FREE movies and series with your Prime (USA) subscription or when you start a 30-day free trial!
Links compiled using automated software. Availability of offers subject to change / might be region specific / out of date.
Sorry, we can't find any suggestions at the moment.
Rob Greene has information about an undercover terror team inside the CIA led by Joe Connelly. To stay alive with the knowledge, he is advised to stay undercover by his supervisor Andrews. Connelly's men try to kill Greene, but he can escape and warns his son Danny that he also may be in danger and that he should look for Dog Thompson, an old military friend of Greene's. Together with Thompson and Bone Conn, another ex-soldier, Danny tries to escape Connelly's henchmen. Meanwhile, Connelly figures that Danny's friend Lisa would make a good target in order to get Danny and also his father.
Leave your thoughts about Hangmen.
| User ReviewDoris FWaste of time. It gets 2 stars because of the gun fight. |
| User ReviewDon SThis movie is horrible. I watched it because Sandra Bullock is in it. It is an early role for her, and she plays the girlfriend of the son of the the main protagonist . You can guess what happens to her - yes, she gets kidnapped! The story is very simplistic, the acting is terrible and there is so much gunplay that consists of shooting bullets at nothing just to be shooting. This is basically the action in the movie. The ending is not believable either. Total crap. |
| User ReviewMike BThis was one of Sandra's first flicks...The acting and the whole storyline is crappy. The execution of the the story is less than a "B" rating period. The Director, the Writer and the Producer should never be allowed to put anything together again like this...furthermore, they should never work together again on any project without supervision. I could not even watch the whole thing it was so horrible. I've seen "D" rated movies that were better... |
| User ReviewScotty MDreadful, cheap and nasty. Sandra Bullock in an early, forgettable role as the love interest/hostage. |
| User ReviewKathryn MYeah, only because it had Sandra Bulllock in it....this movie is pretty terrible. I mean...the boy learns his mother his killed and not a single tear throughout the whole entire movie...the only one showing any emotion in the damn thing was Sandra...lol. Pretty bad.... |
| User ReviewKen SThis movie was horrible, hahaha. There was no plot, it was just about shooting people up, but because it's from 1987, it was horrible and fake. And again, you will see Sandra Bullock advertised for this film a lot, but again, she has like 5 lines if that. It's a waste of 90 minutes.... take a nap or something instead. |
| User ReviewJanine MHangmen Starring: Rick Washburne, Keith Bogard, Jake Lamotta, and Sandra Bullock Director: J. Christian Ingvordson When renegade CIA operatives target a government agent (Washburne) and his teenaged son (Bogard) for death, they find their violent tendencies are exceeded only by the Vietnam veterans who rally to defend their old war-comrade. "Hangmen" is bad on every level. Bad photography (marked by waaay too many extreme close-ups and dull long shots); lame action scenes that rely on slow motion and lots of blood-spurting squibs (and which illustrate the importance of the foley artist and sound effects t in movie making); a script so nonsensical that even the filmmakers couldn't keep track of what was supposed to be going on from one scene to the next (it's rare to see a movie so totally free of continuity control); and dialogue that was exceeded in its horribleness pnly by the acting of those delivering it. This movie's remarkable for having a plot that is less interesting than most 1st-person shooters, with a bodycount that is compreble to them. It also a landmark film in that never have such a concentration of inept renegade CIA agents been assembled in one movie for the purpose of killing people for no real reason while pointlessly disguised as New York City cops, ambulance drivers, or firemen. Finally, the film also features a young Sandra Bullock as the hapless girlfriend of our teenaged hero-by-happenstance. While she is by far the best actor featured, her performance either illustrates that the director of the film was the George Lucas of his day (he could coax a bad performance out of anyone), or that acting is like any craft... the more you practice, the better you get. (Note to Bullock fans: One DVD edition of "Hangmen" has her as the only actor featured on the cover, and it gives her top billing. Don't be fooled. She is a supporting actress here, with an imporfant but small role.) |
| User ReviewDave JThis movie is horrible. I watched it because Sandra Bullock is in it. It is an early role for her, and she plays the girlfriend of the son of the the main protagonist . You can guess what happens to her - yes, she gets kidnapped! The story is very simplistic, the acting is terrible and there is so much gunplay that consists of shooting bullets at nothing just to be shooting. This is basically the action in the movie. The ending is not believable either. Total crap. |
| User ReviewSean OThis movie was horrible, hahaha. There was no plot, it was just about shooting people up, but because it's from 1987, it was horrible and fake. And again, you will see Sandra Bullock advertised for this film a lot, but again, she has like 5 lines if that. It's a waste of 90 minutes.... take a nap or something instead. |