
Sean Haggerty only has an hour to deliver his illegal cargo. An hour to reassure a drug cartel, a hitman, and the DEA that nothing is wrong. An hour to make sure his wife survives. And he must do it all from the cockpit of his Cessna.... (Full plot summary below)
Enjoy FREE movies and series with your Prime (USA) subscription or when you start a 30-day free trial!
Links compiled using automated software. Availability of offers subject to change / might be region specific / out of date.
Sean Haggerty only has an hour to deliver his illegal cargo. An hour to reassure a drug cartel, a hitman, and the DEA that nothing is wrong. An hour to make sure his wife survives. And he must do it all from the cockpit of his Cessna.
Leave your thoughts about Beast of Burden.
| Birth.Movies.Death.Jacob KnightEvery design element is working in sync to never let us feel comfortable, creating a remarkably cramped ambiance. |
| Slant MagazineDerek SmithThe film’s flashbacks, which are either too clipped or excessively scored, effectively step on the actors’ toes. |
| Los Angeles TimesKenneth TuranExperiencing Beast of Burden's inept dialogue and uninspiring direction on screen is a continual trial. |
| User ReviewJLuis_001Daniel Radcliffe deserves credit, getting out of the shadow of a character like Harry Potter is difficult, very difficult but he has tried and his selection of roles has been daring but they generate him very little exposure. He definitely does his job here but the film itself is nothing special. |
| User ReviewFranz CIt has been said that the best way for a filmmaker to criticize a movie is to make one's own, but the would-be thriller "Beast of Burden," written by Adam Hoelzel and Jesper Ganslandt, is a failure compared to the far more impressive "Locke," as both pictures mostly take place inside a particular mode of transport-a small plane in this instance-as the expressive lead is required to tell a seemingly straightforward story using only his rawest acting abilities. While Daniel Radcliffe does what he can with the role, there is no script to work with here. |
| User ReviewNiomie%20 WVery horrible acting for one; The least bit to say is all the movie really consisted of was being in a plane & a man answering the phone between four different people at a point in time it was very confusing to follow eventually the movie made since it's a movie I would recommend to people who have a bland personality I would rate it a one star however maybe some people really like it so I rated it a two out of five *sense not since |
| User ReviewDemiStuartVery engaging from start but it took a nose dive after that. Waste of time. Feeling bad for Daniel Radcliffe. The only reason i watched this movie with boxxy software was him. I was expecting better from him. |
| User ReviewJoe TI always think of a truly terrible film as being the low budget ones they make for the SyFy channel. Horrible actors. Terrible CGI. Incoherent plot. Those movies have almost no chance at being good. Beast of Burden is a totally different type of terrible. You can keep the central idea of the film. You can keep Daniel Radcliffe. You can change about everything else in the movie, and you might have an OK film. But enough of that... Beast of Burden is FISH-STICKING terrible. |
| User ReviewAhmed JVery engaging from start but it took a nose dive after that. waste of time. feeling bad for Daniel Radcliffe. the only reason i watched this movie was him. I was expecting better from him. Bad casting, Bad acting, |
| User ReviewZorro HThe burden is on the viewer. The only thing worse than the body of the work is the ridiculous ending, although at least being the end, grants itself merit. |