
Andy Warhol directs a single 35-minute shot of a man's face to capture his facial expressions as he receives the sexual act depicted in the title.... (Full plot summary below)
Enjoy FREE movies and series with your Prime (USA) subscription or when you start a 30-day free trial!
Links compiled using automated software. Availability of offers subject to change / might be region specific / out of date.
Andy Warhol directs a single 35-minute shot of a man's face to capture his facial expressions as he receives the sexual act depicted in the title.
Leave your thoughts about Blow Job.
| GreenCineBrandon JudellWhen the film was screened for a bunch of Columbia University students, they started singing, 'We Shall Never Come!' |
| User Reviewdfh dWhee, my first Andy Warhol movie! I always thought this one sounded like a cool concept too. My film-history textbook said that the American counterparts to the French New Wave's Truffaut and Godard are Cassavetes and Warhol-- I think I agree, from what I've seen by all four. This film has no "plot" per se, but the single shot it consists of is well composed with cool noir-ish lighting as well as an interesting view to take on the self-explanatory action of the title, and despite its plotlessness it contains a climax... Heh. But yes! A very interesting little film now that I actually watch it. Although definitely not for everybody... |
| User ReviewChelsea Thahaha i wanna blow that guy. what a fucken corker of a film. it has everything. |
| User ReviewEric HI like this film, it's nice. It has blow jobs, and sexy things. It doesn't have a very big story, not a big one, just a average one. But the slow motion, WOW! And when the film, it is speed, SPECTACYULE! The acting, for me, IT IS THE BEST! I reccommend for one, FOR ALL! |
| User ReviewChristopher GExactly the kind of thing you expect from Andy Worhol. Your take on this film will undoubtedly depend on your feelings for the director. Most of the stuff you read about this short film will have you believe that the premise is much more intriguing than it really is. For all the hype, it basically boils down to seven minutes of a badly lit face silently moaning in front of a camera. Is the man on screen truly receiving the titular act? Personally, I think he's faking it. |
| User Reviewmatheus cFilme do Warhol que mostra a câmera fixa durante 30 minutos no rosto de um cara que supostamente está recebendo um boquete. É o tipo de filme que você encontra nas bienais de cultura e exposições de arte. Você tem que sentar, olhar e tirar sua interpretação do que está sendo mostrado. Durante o filme, surgem várias perguntas: "Ele está recebendo um boquete?"; "Ele está fingindo?"; e por aí vai. Ao mesmo tempo que a câmera mostra as expressões faciais, me pareceu um ato tanto solitário, e um boquete geralmente gira em torno da interação entre duas pessoas. Mas mesmo assim você continua capturado, seduzido pela imagem. Sendo o filme de 1963, muito antes desse tempo de exibições via webcam e reality shows, talvez aí resida o motivo do prestígio desse filme, já que naquela época ele já criticava o que de fato está acontecendo hoje em dia. Não é um filme de entretenimento, mas ajuda a desenvolver um pensamento crítico sobre o que vemos na tela e a maneira que interpretamos essas imagens. |
| User ReviewJuan MNot an entertaining film, but a respectable piece of art. |
| User ReviewMaximillion "Puissance et fascination du visage humain. |
| User ReviewPrivate UA timeless example of a young Andy warhol's mastery of the big screen. LMFAO |
| User ReviewLeonardo - Malacay - SPues el concepto es chevere pero en ultimas es aburrido y repetitivo es mejor hacerlo o que te lo hagan que verlo |