
Two neurology students create a telepathy experiment together to visualize a murderer, who recently knifed another student.... (Full plot summary below)
Enjoy FREE movies and series with your Prime (USA) subscription or when you start a 30-day free trial!
Links compiled using automated software. Availability of offers subject to change / might be region specific / out of date.
Two neurology students create a telepathy experiment together to visualize a murderer, who recently knifed another student.
Leave your thoughts about After Last Season.
| User ReviewNulo NAt least since Edweard Muybridge's original experiments with motion photography, no other combination of sound and/or colors in the history of moving images has ever succeeded so thoroughly at making the incorrect aesthetic and technical decision at literally every possible juncture as this film does. It is so erroneous that at least once every 100 frames, this film raises fundamental questions about the cinematic arts that no scholar at any university anywhere in the world would ever have though to ask, had it not come into existence. If a film-school graduate set out to deliberately make the most incomprehensibly wrong film s/he could possibly create, that person would still fail miserably to come anywhere near the frequency and degree of genuinely mind-bending levels of wrongness that occur in this film. I'm not joking, It is seriously astounding that a person with no former film-school training was able to actually create this artwork. Time, lighting, basic human relationships, music, storytelling, visual composition, and almost everything else about both movies and our physical and emotional selves in some form or another is somehow mysteriously queried by this film. Not since Kuleshov's original experiments with the manner in which the human brain derives physical and spatial relationships from the combination of different film sequences has an editor destroyed the entire concept of cinematic geography in such a stomach-churning manner. If Salvador Dali could see this film, he would demand a more coherent plot structure. If you could show it to Ingmar Bergman he would watch the entire thing in silent awe and then slap you in the face and walk away without ever uttering a word. If you could show it to Akira Kurosawa he too would watch the entire thing in silent awe, then watch it a second time, then slap you, and then commit ritual suicide also all without ever uttering a word, This film came out on June 9, 2009, kicking off what is sometimes referred to as the "Summer of Death" due to the large numbers of celebrities and high-profile persons who passed away during that time period. This is not a coincidence. 5 Stars. Absolute must-see. |
| User ReviewChris HAt least since Edweard Muybridge's original experiments with motion photography, no other combination of sound and/or colors in the history of moving images has ever succeeded so thoroughly at making the incorrect aesthetic and technical decision at literally every possible juncture as this film does. It is so erroneous that at least once every 100 frames, this film raises fundamental questions about the cinematic arts that no scholar at any university anywhere in the world would ever have though to ask, had it not come into existence. If a film-school graduate set out to deliberately make the most incomprehensibly wrong film s/he could possibly create, that person would still fail miserably to come anywhere near the frequency and degree of genuinely mind-bending levels of wrongness that occur in this film. I'm not joking, It is seriously astounding that a person with no former film-school training was able to actually create this artwork. Time, lighting, basic human relationships, music, storytelling, visual composition, and almost everything else about both movies and our physical and emotional selves in some form or another is somehow mysteriously queried by this film. Not since Kuleshov's original experiments with the manner in which the human brain derives physical and spatial relationships from the combination of different film sequences has an editor destroyed the entire concept of cinematic geography in such a stomach-churning manner. If Salvador Dali could see this film, he would demand a more coherent plot structure. If you could show it to Ingmar Bergman he would watch the entire thing in silent awe and then slap you in the face and walk away without ever uttering a word. If you could show it to Akira Kurosawa he too would watch the entire thing in silent awe, then watch it a second time, then slap you, and then commit ritual suicide also all without ever uttering a word, This film came out on June 9, 2009, kicking off what is sometimes referred to as the "Summer of Death" due to the large numbers of celebrities and high-profile persons who passed away during that time period. This is not a coincidence. 5 Stars. Absolute must-see. |
| User ReviewGreg GUtterly bizarre and hilarious. See this instead of Tommy Wiseau's THE ROOM! |
| User ReviewMatthew HThis is a film about questions. Raising themâ?¦and answering them. Questions like: How many separate locations can you use your momâ??s house for? Is it possible to build a functioning MRI machine out of carboard boxes? How many stacks of 11â?? x 8.5â?? printer paper does it take to decorate a room? Is that constant ambient toilet flushing noise going to be a problem? Can plot be replaced with drawn out conversations about where the printers are located? What exactly is the lowest limit of CGI? How many extended shots of random pieces of furniture does it take to fill 93 minutes? If a man made of cones appears out of nowhere, how long before a ghost named Craig throws a chair at a confused actor holding a knife? And so many more. In other words, this is a masterpiece of unintentional absurdism. See it. |
| User ReviewWilhelm HMODERN DAY SHAKESPEARE... I've never heard of such dialogue in any and I mean ANY production ... here's a snippet: Matthew Andrews: So, picture a flat surface. Out of the surface, one letter rises. Sarah Austin: From the alphabet? Matthew Andrews: Yes. SHAKESPEARE IN MODERN FORM DARN IT |
| User ReviewTom vThis is a film about questions. Raising themâ?¦and answering them. Questions like: How many separate locations can you use your momâ??s house for? Is it possible to build a functioning MRI machine out of carboard boxes? How many stacks of 11â?? x 8.5â?? printer paper does it take to decorate a room? Is that constant ambient toilet flushing noise going to be a problem? Can plot be replaced with drawn out conversations about where the printers are located? What exactly is the lowest limit of CGI? How many extended shots of random pieces of furniture does it take to fill 93 minutes? If a man made of cones appears out of nowhere, how long before a ghost named Craig throws a chair at a confused actor holding a knife? And so many more. In other words, this is a masterpiece of unintentional absurdism. See it. |
| User ReviewSharon GIf you've ever imagined what kind of brainwashing propaganda a kidnapper would show you to break your mind to succumb to their power, this is their number one choice film. This film is so strange, otherworldly and mind devouring that IT's free on Youtube for any poor soul to stumble upon and suffer through. Should you watch this film? Yes. IT changes you. It changes your soul, your train of thought, your microscopic brain chemistry. You have the power to choice to watch this film. Choose wisely. |
| User ReviewJohn SAt least since Edweard Muybridge's original experiments with motion photography, no other combination of sound and/or colors in the history of moving images has ever succeeded so thoroughly at making the incorrect aesthetic and technical decision at literally every possible juncture as this film does. It is so erroneous that at least once every 100 frames, this film raises fundamental questions about the cinematic arts that no scholar at any university anywhere in the world would ever have though to ask, had it not come into existence. If a film-school graduate set out to deliberately make the most incomprehensibly wrong film s/he could possibly create, that person would still fail miserably to come anywhere near the frequency and degree of genuinely mind-bending levels of wrongness that occur in this film. I'm not joking, It is seriously astounding that a person with no former film-school training was able to actually create this artwork. Time, lighting, basic human relationships, music, storytelling, visual composition, and almost everything else about both movies and our physical and emotional selves in some form or another is somehow mysteriously queried by this film. Not since Kuleshov's original experiments with the manner in which the human brain derives physical and spatial relationships from the combination of different film sequences has an editor destroyed the entire concept of cinematic geography in such a stomach-churning manner. If Salvador Dali could see this film, he would demand a more coherent plot structure. If you could show it to Ingmar Bergman he would watch the entire thing in silent awe and then slap you in the face and walk away without ever uttering a word. If you could show it to Akira Kurosawa he too would watch the entire thing in silent awe, then watch it a second time, then slap you, and then commit ritual suicide also all without ever uttering a word, This film came out on June 9, 2009, kicking off what is sometimes referred to as the "Summer of Death" due to the large numbers of celebrities and high-profile persons who passed away during that time period. This is not a coincidence. 5 Stars. Absolute must-see. |
| User ReviewEdwin HIf you've ever imagined what kind of brainwashing propaganda a kidnapper would show you to break your mind to succumb to their power, this is their number one choice film. This film is so strange, otherworldly and mind devouring that IT's free on Youtube for any poor soul to stumble upon and suffer through. Should you watch this film? Yes. IT changes you. It changes your soul, your train of thought, your microscopic brain chemistry. You have the power to choice to watch this film. Choose wisely. |
| User ReviewKevin WAt least since Edweard Muybridge's original experiments with motion photography, no other combination of sound and/or colors in the history of moving images has ever succeeded so thoroughly at making the incorrect aesthetic and technical decision at literally every possible juncture as this film does. It is so erroneous that at least once every 100 frames, this film raises fundamental questions about the cinematic arts that no scholar at any university anywhere in the world would ever have though to ask, had it not come into existence. If a film-school graduate set out to deliberately make the most incomprehensibly wrong film s/he could possibly create, that person would still fail miserably to come anywhere near the frequency and degree of genuinely mind-bending levels of wrongness that occur in this film. I'm not joking, It is seriously astounding that a person with no former film-school training was able to actually create this artwork. Time, lighting, basic human relationships, music, storytelling, visual composition, and almost everything else about both movies and our physical and emotional selves in some form or another is somehow mysteriously queried by this film. Not since Kuleshov's original experiments with the manner in which the human brain derives physical and spatial relationships from the combination of different film sequences has an editor destroyed the entire concept of cinematic geography in such a stomach-churning manner. If Salvador Dali could see this film, he would demand a more coherent plot structure. If you could show it to Ingmar Bergman he would watch the entire thing in silent awe and then slap you in the face and walk away without ever uttering a word. If you could show it to Akira Kurosawa he too would watch the entire thing in silent awe, then watch it a second time, then slap you, and then commit ritual suicide also all without ever uttering a word, This film came out on June 9, 2009, kicking off what is sometimes referred to as the "Summer of Death" due to the large numbers of celebrities and high-profile persons who passed away during that time period. This is not a coincidence. 5 Stars. Absolute must-see. |